892 research outputs found

    Normalizer of the Chevalley group of type E7E_7

    Full text link
    We consider the simply connected Chevalley group G(E7,R)G(E_7,R) of type E7E_7 in the 56-dimensional representation. The main objective of the paper is to prove that the following four groups coincide: the normalizer of the elementary Chevalley group E(E7,R)E(E_7,R), the normalizer of the Chevalley group G(E7,R)G(E_7,R) itself, the transporter of E(E7,R)E(E_7,R) into G(E7,R)G(\mathrm E_7,R), and the extended Chevalley group Gβ€Ύ(E7,R)\overline G(E_7,R). This holds over an arbitrary commutative ring RR, with all normalizers and transporters being calculated in GL(56,R)GL(56,R). Moreover, we characterize Gβ€Ύ(E7,R)\overline G(E_7,R) as the stabilizer of a system of quadrics. This last result is classically known over algebraically closed fields, here we prove that the corresponding group scheme is smooth over Z\mathbb Z, which implies that it holds over arbitrary commutative rings. These results are one of the key steps in our subsequent paper, dedicated to the overgroups of exceptional groups in minimal representations.Comment: 23 pages, will be published in St. Petersburg Mathematical Journa

    Generation of relative commutator subgroups in Chevalley groups. II

    Full text link
    In the present paper, which is a direct sequel of our paper [12] joint with Roozbeh Hazrat, we prove unrelativised version of the standard commutator formula in the setting of Chevalley groups. Namely, let Ξ¦\Phi be a reduced irreducible root system of rank β‰₯2\ge 2, let RR be a commutative ring and let I,JI,J be two ideals of RR. We consider subgroups of the Chevalley group G(Ξ¦,R)G(\Phi,R) of type Ξ¦\Phi over RR. The unrelativised elementary subgroup E(Ξ¦,I)E(\Phi,I) of level II is generated (as a group) by the elementary unipotents xΞ±(ΞΎ)x_{\alpha}(\xi), α∈Φ\alpha\in\Phi, ξ∈I\xi\in I, of level II. Obviously, in general E(Ξ¦,I)E(\Phi,I) has no chances to be normal in E(Ξ¦,R)E(\Phi,R), its normal closure in the absolute elementary subgroup E(Ξ¦,R)E(\Phi,R) is denoted by E(Ξ¦,R,I)E(\Phi,R,I). The main results of [12] implied that the commutator [E(Ξ¦,I),E(Ξ¦,J)]\big[E(\Phi,I),E(\Phi,J)] is in fact normal in E(Ξ¦,R)E(\Phi,R). In the present paper we prove an unexpected result that in fact [E(Ξ¦,I),E(Ξ¦,J)]=[E(Ξ¦,R,I),E(Ξ¦,R,J)]\big[E(\Phi,I),E(\Phi,J)]=\big[E(\Phi,R,I),E(\Phi,R,J)\big]. It follows that the standard commutator formula also holds in the unrelativised form, namely [E(Ξ¦,I),C(Ξ¦,R,J)]=[E(Ξ¦,I),E(Ξ¦,J)]\big[E(\Phi,I),C(\Phi,R,J)]=\big[E(\Phi,I),E(\Phi,J)\big], where C(Ξ¦,R,I)C(\Phi,R,I) is the full congruence subgroup of level II. In particular, E(Ξ¦,I)E(\Phi,I) is normal in C(Ξ¦,R,I)C(\Phi,R,I).Comment: 14 Page

    Grothendieck-Serre Conjecture I: Appendix

    Full text link
    We prove here some supplementary statements that appeared without proof in I. Panin, A. Stavrova, N. Vavilov, On Grothendieck--Serre's conjecture concerning principal GG-bundles over reductive group schemes:I, arXiv:0905.1418Comment: We prove some supplementary statements that appeared without proof in arXiv:0905.1418; 10 page

    Generation of relative commutator subgroups in Chevalley groups

    Full text link
    Let Ξ¦\Phi be a reduced irreducible root system of rank β‰₯2\ge 2, let RR be a commutative ring and let I,JI,J be two ideals of RR. In the present paper we describe generators of the commutator groups of relative elementary subgroups [E(Ξ¦,R,I),E(Ξ¦,R,J)]\big[E(\Phi,R,I),E(\Phi,R,J)\big] both as normal subgroups of the elementary Chevalley group E(Ξ¦,R)E(\Phi,R), and as groups. Namely, let x_{\a}(\xi), \a\in\Phi, ξ∈R\xi\in R, be an elementary generator of E(Ξ¦,R)E(\Phi,R). As a normal subgroup of the absolute elementary group E(Ξ¦,R)E(\Phi,R), the relative elementary subgroup is generated by x_{\a}(\xi), \a\in\Phi, ξ∈I\xi\in I. Classical results due to Michael Stein, Jacques Tits and Leonid Vaserstein assert that as a group E(Ξ¦,R,I)E(\Phi,R,I) is generated by z_{\a}(\xi,\eta), where \a\in\Phi, ξ∈I\xi\in I, η∈R\eta\in R. In the present paper, we prove the following birelative analogues of these results. As a normal subgroup of E(Ξ¦,R)E(\Phi,R) the relative commutator subgroup [E(Ξ¦,R,I),E(Ξ¦,R,J)]\big[E(\Phi,R,I),E(\Phi,R,J)\big] is generated by the following three types of generators: i) [xΞ±(ΞΎ),zΞ±(ΞΆ,Ξ·)]\big[x_{\alpha}(\xi),z_{\alpha}(\zeta,\eta)\big], ii) [xΞ±(ΞΎ),xβˆ’Ξ±(ΞΆ)]\big[x_{\alpha}(\xi),x_{-\alpha}(\zeta)\big], and iii) xΞ±(ΞΎΞΆ)x_{\alpha}(\xi\zeta), where α∈Φ\alpha\in\Phi, ξ∈I\xi\in I, ΢∈J\zeta\in J, η∈R\eta\in R. As a group, the generators are essentially the same, only that type iii) should be enlarged to iv) zΞ±(ΞΎΞΆ,Ξ·)z_{\alpha}(\xi\zeta,\eta). For classical groups, these results, with much more computational proofs, were established in previous papers by the authors. There is already an amazing application of these results, namely in the recent work of Alexei Stepanov on relative commutator width

    Multiple Commutator Formulas for Unitary Groups

    Full text link
    Let (\FormR) be a form ring such that AA is quasi-finite RR-algebra (i.e., a direct limit of module finite algebras) with identity. We consider the hyperbolic Bak's unitary groups \GU(2n,\FormR), nβ‰₯3n\ge 3. For a form ideal (I,Ξ“)(I,\Gamma) of the form ring (\FormR) we denote by \EU(2n,I,\Gamma) and \GU(2n,I,\Gamma) the relative elementary group and the principal congruence subgroup of level (I,Ξ“)(I,\Gamma), respectively. Now, let (Ii,Ξ“i)(I_i,\Gamma_i) , i=0,...,mi=0,...,m, be form ideals of the form ring (A,Ξ›)(A,\Lambda). The main result of the present paper is the following multiple commutator formula [\big[\EU(2n,I_0,\Gamma_0),&\GU(2n,I_1,\Gamma_1),\GU(2n, I_2,\Gamma_2),..., \GU(2n,I_m,\Gamma_m)\big]= &\big[\EU(2n,I_0,\Gamma_0),\EU(2n,I_1,\Gamma_1),\EU(2n,I_2,\Gamma_2),..., \EU(2n, I_m, \Gamma_m)\big],] which is a broad generalization of the standard commutator formulas. This result contains all previous results on commutator formulas for classical like-groups over commutative and finite-dimensional rings.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:0911.551

    Relative commutator calculus in Chevalley groups

    Full text link
    We revisit localisation and patching method in the setting of Chevalley groups. Introducing certain subgroups of relative elementary Chevalley groups, we develop relative versions of the conjugation calculus and the commutator calculus in Chevalley groups G(Ξ¦,R)G(\Phi,R), \rk(\Phi)\geq 2, which are both more general, and substantially easier than the ones available in the literature. For classical groups such relative commutator calculus has been recently developed by the authors in \cite{RZ,RNZ}. As an application we prove the mixed commutator formula, \big [E(\Phi,R,\ma),C(\Phi,R,\mb)\big ]=\big [E(\Phi,R,\ma),E(\Phi,R,\mb)\big], for two ideals \ma,\mb\unlhd R. This answers a problem posed in a paper by Alexei Stepanov and the second author

    Relative centralisers of relative subgroups

    Full text link
    Let RR be an associative ring with 1, G=GL(n,R)G=GL(n, R) be the general linear group of degree nβ‰₯3n\ge 3 over RR. In this paper we calculate the relative centralisers of the relative elementary subgroups or the principal congruence subgroups, corresponding to an ideal A⊴RA\unlhd R modulo the relative elementary subgroups or the principal congruence subgroups, corresponding to another ideal B⊴RB\unlhd R. Modulo congruence subgroups the results are essentially easy exercises in linear algebra. But modulo the elementary subgroups they turned out to be quite tricky, and we could get definitive answers only over commutative rings, or, in some cases, only over Dedekind rings. We discuss also some further related problems, such as the interrelations of various birelative commutator subgroups, etc., and state several unsolved questions.Comment: 12 page

    Commutators of relative and unrelative elementary subgroups in Chevalley groups

    Full text link
    In the present paper, which is a direct sequel of our papers [10,11,35] joint with Roozbeh Hazrat, we achieve a further dramatic reduction of the generating sets for commutators of relative elementary subgroups in Chevalley groups. Namely, let Ξ¦\Phi be a reduced irreducible root system of rank β‰₯2\ge 2, let RR be a commutative ring and let A,BA,B be two ideals of RR. We consider subgroups of the Chevalley group G(Ξ¦,R)G(\Phi,R) of type Ξ¦\Phi over RR. The unrelative elementary subgroup E(Ξ¦,A)E(\Phi,A) of level AA is generated (as a group) by the elementary unipotents xΞ±(a)x_{\alpha}(a), α∈Φ\alpha\in\Phi, a∈Aa\in A, of level AA. Its normal closure in the absolute elementary subgroup E(Ξ¦,R)E(\Phi,R) is denoted by E(Ξ¦,R,A)E(\Phi,R,A) and is called the relative elementary subgroup of level AA. The main results of [11,35] consisted in construction of economic generator sets for the mutual commutator subgroups [E(Ξ¦,R,A),E(Ξ¦,R,B)][E(\Phi,R,A),E(\Phi,R,B)], where AA and BB are two ideals of RR. It turned out that one can take Stein---Tits---Vaserstein generators of E(Ξ¦,R,AB)E(\Phi,R,AB), plus elementary commutators of the form yΞ±(a,b)=[xΞ±(a),xβˆ’Ξ±(b)]y_{\alpha}(a,b)=[x_{\alpha}(a),x_{-\alpha}(b)], where a∈Aa\in A, b∈Bb\in B. Here we improve these results even further, by showing that in fact it suffices to engage only elementary commutators corresponding to {\it one\/} long root, and that modulo E(Ξ¦,R,AB)E(\Phi,R,AB) the commutators yΞ±(a,b)y_{\alpha}(a,b) behave as symbols. We discuss also some further variations and applications of these results.Comment: 18 pages. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1811.1126

    Relative and unrelative elementary groups, revisited

    Full text link
    Let RR be any associative ring with 11, nβ‰₯3n\ge 3, and let A,BA,B be two-sided ideals of RR. In the present paper we show that the mixed commutator subgroup [E(n,R,A),E(n,R,B)][E(n,R,A),E(n,R,B)] is generated as a group by the elements of the two following forms: 1) zij(ab,c)z_{ij}(ab,c) and zij(ba,c)z_{ij}(ba,c), 2) [tij(a),tji(b)][t_{ij}(a),t_{ji}(b)], where 1≀iβ‰ j≀n1\le i\neq j\le n, a∈Aa\in A, b∈Bb\in B, c∈Rc\in R. Moreover, for the second type of generators, it suffices to fix one pair of indices (i,j)(i,j). This result is both stronger and more general than the previous results by Roozbeh Hazrat and the authors. In particular, it implies that for all associative rings one has the equality [E(n,R,A),E(n,R,B)]=[E(n,A),E(n,B)]\big[E(n,R,A),E(n,R,B)\big]=\big[E(n,A),E(n,B)\big] and many further corollaries can be derived for rings subject to commutativity conditions.Comment: 12 page

    Multiple commutators of elementary subgroups: end of the line

    Full text link
    In our previous joint papers with Roozbeh Hazrat and Alexei Stepanov we established commutator formulas for relative elementary subgroups in GL(n,R)GL(n,R), nβ‰₯3n\ge 3, and other similar groups, such as Bak's unitary groups, or Chevalley groups. In particular, there it was shown that multiple commutators of elementary subgroups can be reduced to double such commutators. However, since the proofs of these results depended on the standard commutator formulas, it was assumed that the ground ring RR is quasi-finite. Here we propose a different approach which allows to lift any such assumptions and establish almost definitive results. In particular, we prove multiple commutator formulas, and other related facts for GL(n,R)GL(n,R) over an {\it arbitrary} associative ring RR.Comment: 14 pages. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1910.0898
    • …
    corecore